City says NO CAMERAS – Seim says NO WAY!

Published September 30, 2014 - 21 Comments

NO Cameras America!

Moses Lake is a small town of about twenty thousand, run by lawless city manager named Joe Gavinski. He does the dirty work while the city council hides from responsibility.  During my Congressional race the city was stealing my signs. Why? Because I would not sign a contract with them for a grant of free speech.

After various encounters they ended up getting badly exposed but still did not learn their lesson. So they tried to prevent filming in city buildings by adding a NO CAMERAS sign. This is not the first time government organizations have done this because of yours truly.The problem is the city manager simply made up the rule and it has no basis in law. Even if they had voted it into a city code, it would be unconstitutional and void.

So I went in to check for any straggling signs they had stolen after the election and of course I filmed, despite the silly sign. They in turn called in police., once again violating Federal law under (18 U.S. Code § 242). In the video I call them out and have a decent conversation, educating the officer about how the law really works. Then I openly defy their not so cute policy to make it clear  that such things do not have to be obeyed

Lawless law is not law.

Officers and officials often have this idea that because a “law” was made then they must enforce it. It’s their job after all and this has been drilled into them. But in truth they have to pick a side. They swore an oath first to the Constitution, then to other laws. If they violate the first, they break the oath. It’s that simple.

We need to stop tolerating officials that violate the law we placed upon them. The petty rules government makes up are in no way law when they violate the US and the State Constitution. These are laws WE placed on them. We are the masters and their every legal mandate is a grant from us. This principle goes back to Americas founding and before. John Locke is a good study here.

In the video we actually discuss some interesting historical legal foundations with the officer. Remember that despite signs, or lawless orders, you can and should film your public officials. We the people have no obligation to follow lawless rules because regardless of who wrote them, they are not law.

— Gav

Joe Gavinski tries to tell me to go to the building next door. When I decline directs the woman to call police.

Joe Gavinski tries to get rid of me. When I decline directs the woman to call police.

21 comments

k.c. ferrill - September 30, 2014 Reply

Gavin Seim. Egomaniac.

    Thomas McDill - October 16, 2014 Reply

    People like you are the problem. You are so used to just bending over and taking the abuse that you think he’s an egomaniac. He is 100% Right!!! If we continue to turn a blind eye and follow laws that are against the constitution we will eventually have no rights. Educate yourself like I have and realize that if we don’t act now we will become another Nazi Germany.

      Steve Holmes - March 23, 2015 Reply

      AMEN!

    Jesse - October 16, 2014 Reply

    Nope. Enforcing our rights does not make him an egomaniac. Are you a statist?

    H - November 10, 2014 Reply

    Don’t mistake confidence for ego. Gavin knows what hes talking about and the “officials” dont which makes them look very stupid. Not Gavin’s problem.

    Nunuvyer Bizniz - March 21, 2015 Reply

    K C Ferrill – Slave.

Beth Hart - September 30, 2014 Reply

Awesome Gavin.

Pharaoh - October 1, 2014 Reply

I would love to interview you on my radio show. Please email me back. Ledfordthomas@ymail.com

Debbie - October 1, 2014 Reply

Gavin,
If the city manager’s duties include to answer questions from the People, and has not fully answered their or your questions, he now, has acted outside his offical capacity as a public offical and can now be brought up on charges in his private capacity as Joe Gavinski. Does he have a current oath filed with the county?
Good video.
I just wonder how many public officials would be able to pass a public offical questionaire in reguards to their duties and obligations to their oath of office and how many think the codes apply to the people that do not have employment with government or their departments, agencies and other entities. On this questionaire it could ask them, where they have found their proof for the answers they give.
As you see I’m thinking about making up a questionaire for our county officals, it really won’t take that many questions before you could tell which public servants know where the line really is.
If you have the time, listen to Rod Class on Talkshoe, you can go to ” myprivateaudio.com” and click on talkshoe at the top, go to Friday’s calls click on AIB RADIO and listen to his last three or four calls. He got a case in Washington D.C. he is dealing with and has been holding his own with the judge and the prosecuting attorney. Good listening and very informational.

lonnie - October 3, 2014 Reply

Thanks for all the information that you post and truly hope you get elected into our government , sometime in the near future !!!!! Semper Fi !!!!!!

Thomas E. Kellowski - October 13, 2014 Reply

Hey Gavin,
I follow a lot of your videos closley but I noticed in this article you failed to cite the actual case law and legal definitions encompassing filming in a public facility. I understand that we assert that we have a God given right of the first amendment. But regardless, I’m assuming that there has to be case law regarding this specific issue of restricting or promoting the filming of public officials in public, restrictive and nonrestrictive, facilities. If not then, then it is only up for interpretation and not unconstutiional under the first amendment, which would not result in any criminal or civil liability as of yet.

According to Section 242 of Title 18 of the U.S.C., its ” a crime for any person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the constitution or laws of the United States”. Unfortunately the enforcement of this law seems to have no substinance in this particular situation until there is specific case law regarding an administration’s legal authority to set restricted areas by administrative policy. If you clear this up for this objective thinker, I would greatly appreciate it.

Andrew Arnold - October 17, 2014 Reply

Wow, now I finally understand how 14 year old girls feel at a Justin Bieber concert! Gavin is a wonderful thorn in the side of those who would abuse their power!!!

A. Davis - October 18, 2014 Reply

Thank you Gavin! I am going to get a pocket Constitution soon.

Lachelle - October 20, 2014 Reply

@Andrew Arnold- LOLOLOLO
IKR!

Anonymous - October 21, 2014 Reply

Wow, you really got him with the point that the cameras on the police cars are similar if not duplicitous to the rights in question. looks like the police officer was responsible and “taking his oath seriously”. Something to remember and consider, as this progressive wave of political corruption engulfs this nation, the city manager appears to be acting without regard to law or the consequences of his actions, usually means he has the case beat before it even arises…what I’m saying is often times as of late the judicial process from trial court up through appeals and even the supreme courts are entirely rigged, the decisions are gauranteed way before you even file your first petition. The right to trial by jury has been temporarily removed, and therefore you are SUBJECTED to an arbitrary and capricious process dependent usually upon “carefully placed judges”, bought and paid for, puppets with their strings being pulled, upon prtended authority.
These acts of governmental corruption, are of course, contrary to the US constitution, and therefore without actual “jurisdiction” (Article 6 sec 3, 14th Amd sec 3) at anytime. That is not to say that they don’t have actual effects, the road to correction is in getting our Grand Juries properly functioning, so that the officers supporting and defending the law can be safer and their positions are not compromised, and the officers acting outside of their authority can be held accountable.

christina macneal - October 23, 2014 Reply

Yes. Everyone has a voice and must use it be a small challenge or great exploit against evil- that’s everyones responsibility. Take a stand for your rights. *Whistleblower re: State / Federal Corruption-CollusionRico Violation. Christina MacNeal

christina macneal - October 23, 2014 Reply

Gavin Seim has passionate calling in life – he is truly one dedicated person whom will make a *positive effect in this life and world. He is edifying – he is a good man. *Congressional *Whistleblower in Ct. – Christina MacNeal

jimmy Endres - October 28, 2014 Reply

Gavin I love your passion for the us constitution and applying it like we all should because if we don’t and continue too let this lawlessness happen by our govermment we will not have any rights left for the people . keep it up and thanks for teaching me what the constitution is there for

Jeffery Eiffert - December 1, 2014 Reply

I think patriots across this state and the country sometimes feel like giving up. Were called crazy and people just don’t understand. Many times people in our lives don’t understand. When I woke up and started getting active my girlfriend (with our children) left me and we are still going a through a custody battle in Grant County etc etc etc. When you see the truth and understand it and can see what will happen if its not stopped you have to do something, else its like a thorn in your mind. I am inspired by you and its obvious we have to inspire each other because the difficulties that come with knowing and acting on the truth are great. If you need help with anything let me know. Jeff

Arturo Roque - December 8, 2014 Reply

Hi Gavin Great video on the Joe Gavinski matter….What is the status on this issue? I am curious to know. These public servants were clearly not doing their job. Are you planning a lawsuit? If you are I am willing to donate to this lawsuit. Hope you sue the crap out of that secretary. I cant believe she is a public servant and thinks she has the privilege to ask not to be recorded. Contact me if you are interested in suing these public officials. I am interested in donating financially.

Leave a Reply: